<div dir="ltr">There is a tag historic=rune_stone which sounds like it's a similar sort of thing. Would historic=ogham_stone be a better fit perhaps?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 1:25 PM Anne-Karoline Distel <<a href="mailto:annekadistel@web.de">annekadistel@web.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Thanks for the feedback. I really don't know about <font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">stone</font> vs <font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">stone_type</font>. There
is no wiki page for <font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">stone</font>,
that's why I didn't choose it. I don't think I can be expected to
suggest using keys that don't exist in the wiki.</p>
<p>b-unicycling<br>
</p>
<div>Am 07/02/2021 um 17:58 schrieb Jan
Michel:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">Hi,
<br>
I suggest to keep the proposal simple. That is, describe the main
goal (introducing stone_type=ogham_stone), add a few relevant
links to other tags (e.g. Key:inscription). Add a short
explanation, why you chose to use stone_type instead of stone
(because of current use of both keys strongly suggested that).
<br>
Don't merge too many things into one proposal. There's always one
special aspect one person doesn't like and that makes them vote
against.
<br>
<br>
Your basic proposal, to have a tag for Ogham stones would have
been clearly approved if either the '_type' aspect or the
inscription:* aspect had been missing.
<br>
<br>
Regarding your idea of adding references to an external database -
this could be done, but please use some standard tags.
ref:ogham=NUMBER_OR_NAME would be a reasonable way.
<br>
But don't include it in the proposal of your primary key - there's
always a few voters who don't like external references (for good
reasons) and, combined with others, let the proposal fail.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Jan
<br>
<br>
On 07.02.21 16:05, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">It looks like it might not get approved,
so I'll have to adapt the proposal to try and get a better
standard. A resource has come to my attention that could add
more value. I'll just copy and paste what I put on the
discussion page, in case people don't find it there:
<br>
</blockquote>
If we had a tag ogham_in_3d:ref
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"> to add the name, the link could be
displayed similarly to how the
<br>
wikipedia or mapillary links work.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
Tagging mailing list
<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div>