<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Le 8 février 2021 04:29:45 GMT+01:00, Stefan Tauner <<a href="mailto:stefan.tauner@gmx.at">stefan.tauner@gmx.at</a>> a écrit :<br></div><div><br></div><div>However, the basic idea of the landuse key is to "describe the primary<br></div><div>use of land". There can't be two primary uses.<br></div></blockquote><div>Such documentation requires improvements.<br></div><div><br></div><div>We definitely can have landuse=forest in landuse=military<br></div><div>and landuse=flowerbed in landuse=residential<br></div><div><br></div><div>If you hate landuse=flowerbed you can try inventing tag <br></div><div>for alternative tagging and convince mappers and preset<br></div><div>authors to switch to it.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It may be quite hard, but if you care about purity of landuse key<br></div><div>it is far better than waiting till it will become as entrenched as<br></div><div>landuse=forest is.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Feb 8, 2021, 06:20 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Le 8 février 2021 04:29:45 GMT+01:00, Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at> a écrit :<br></div><div>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:06:11 +1000<br></div><div>>Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><blockquote><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>>However, the basic idea of the landuse key is to "describe the primary<br></div><div>>use of land". There can't be two primary uses.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I'm not so sure, depends if you're a soldier, a gardener or a sheep after all.<br></div><div>The flowerbed cut by the military area fence example : it would seems really artificial to cut it.<br></div></blockquote><div>In case of a fence splitting flowerbed could make sense.<br></div><div><br></div><div>But I have seen case of a really long flowerbed forming one object - and going<br></div><div>along road, not interrupted from clearly residential area to clearly<br></div><div>retail area.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Splitting flowerbed forming one floral arrangement just because surrounding<br></div><div>land use changes would be silly.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Or cases where I can link mapped area:<br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.4843&mlon=15.7111#map=16/53.4843/15.7111">https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.4843&mlon=15.7111#map=16/53.4843/15.7111</a><br></div><div>military/forest<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.08192&mlon=19.90083#map=19/50.08192/19.90083">https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.08192&mlon=19.90083#map=19/50.08192/19.90083</a><br></div><div>park and tree covered area are crossing, similarly playground<br></div><div>may be shared by two named residential areas and be in both at once<br></div><div><br></div><div>landuse=construction may freely overlap with basically anything<br></div> </body>
</html>