<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi, Paul.</p>
<p>Thank for your comment. That is correct. I have also used
"historic=yes". It is the most obvious, though not the most
specific.</p>
<p>A historic building is tagged "historic=building". This is a
specific value for "historic". It could also be tagged as
"building=yes" + "historic=yes". It is correct, but it is not
specific.</p>
<p>This proposal tries to document in the best possible way a value
in use for the key "historic". I think that historic cemeteries
are features with enough entity to have a specific documented
value for "historic". On the "Key:historic" page there are some
well-documented values. [1]</p>
<p>This proposal is not very ambitious in reality. It only tries to
document a value in use. Instead of directly creating the tag page
on the wiki, I thought it might be a good idea to prepare a
proposal. I think that with everyone's cooperation the result will
be better. I only know the two historic cemeteries in my city.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Daniel</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>[1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic</a><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 9/2/21 a las 23:06, Paul Allen
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPy1dOKuaowi16H3qz-nKhCWmG1H99CA_3jXU1+fkqaK4+uAow@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 21:37, Daniel Capilla <<a
href="mailto:dcapillae@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">dcapillae@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I am preparing a draft
proposal for "historic=cemetery". The proposal is <br>
very simple. However, as this is the first time I am
preparing a <br>
proposal, I am open to any suggestions.</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Your proposal says "The most obvious alternative for
mapping a historic cemetery</div>
<div> would be <tt dir="ltr" class="gmail-mw-content-ltr"
style="background:rgb(238,238,255) none repeat scroll 0%
0%;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6">landuse=cemetery</tt> +
<tt dir="ltr" class="gmail-mw-content-ltr"
style="background:rgb(238,238,255) none repeat scroll 0%
0%;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6">historic=yes</tt>.
Indeed it is. It's how I'd do it.</div>
<div>It's how others have done it.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Your proposal then goes on to say "This tagging has the
disadvantage of being</div>
<div> unspecific." In what way is historic=cemetery more
specific than</div>
<div>landuse=cemetery + historic=yes? Both specify a historic
cemetery.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- <br>
</div>
<div>Paul</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>