<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
In this case, you could also tag that as tourism=museum +
building=palace + historic=yes.<br>
<br>
In this matter, I agree with Paul. historic=* should only be used as
an attribute, not as a first level tag. I don't see any reason to
use it otherwise.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
António.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Às 19:08 de 11/02/2021, Diego Cruz
escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAE+pf=y=Ux5kdtmuR5NVKOFkgJ-+vvJ4xxPKtsQG0JdW95q+HA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr"> For example, you can have an object tagged as a
tourism=museum and also add historic=palace, because it is
historically important as a palace, not as a museum.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El jue, 11 feb 2021 a las
21:20, Daniel Capilla (<<a
href="mailto:dcapillae@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">dcapillae@gmail.com</a>>)
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
11/2/21 20:47, Paul Allen wrote:<br>
> Our tagging space is slowly degenerating from the white
noise of entropy.<br>
<br>
I want a T-shirt with that on it! :D<br>
<br>
Joking aside, I understand what Paul is saying. However, this
proposal <br>
does not try to solve a problem that goes beyond it.<br>
<br>
The mappers are using "historic=cemetery". It seems to me to
be <br>
appropriate to indicate a cemetery of historic significance in
<br>
accordance with the guidelines for the use of the"historic"
key. The <br>
value is not confusing, its meaning is quite clear.<br>
<br>
If you think my proposal might cause confusion if it is
approved (or <br>
even if it is proposed), I can withdraw it and just document
the tag on <br>
the wiki as a tag in use but not formally proposed.<br>
<br>
In my opinion, this proposal is very simple, useful, and not <br>
problematic, but you have more experience than me. What do you
suggest <br>
to me? I am open to suggestions. My initial intention was to
clarify the <br>
issue, not to obscure it further.<br>
<br>
Question for the Tagging mailing list: Should I propose it or
not?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>