<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 18:25, Robin Burek <<a href="mailto:robin.burek@gmx.de">robin.burek@gmx.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div lang="x-unicode">
<p>Am 11.02.2021 um 18:28 schrieb Peter Neale via Tagging:<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:16px">
<div><br><div dir="ltr">They very often (but not
always) have different operating hours, which you cannot
show, if you insist on one entity with attributes)</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>of course you can, do you read my/our proposal? <br>
</p></div></div></blockquote><div>You're right. All we have to do is change all the editors to handle</div><div>your new way of specifying the extra opening hours. And then</div><div>change all the data consumers to handle the extra opening hours</div><div>that otherwise they may not display.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And then live with the fact that people looking at the map to find a</div><div>post office won't see it because it's in a shop. Or maybe they won't</div><div>see the shop they're looking for because it's shown as a post office.</div><div>Or maybe we can then convince all the different cartos to display some</div><div> sort of new hybrid symbol.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm not convinced this is a sensible idea, even in Germany. Why</div><div>don't you just pretend the post office counter is separate enough</div><div>to count as shop-in-shop?</div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Paul</div><div><br></div></div></div>