<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 at 13:42, stevea <<a href="mailto:steveaOSM@softworkers.com">steveaOSM@softworkers.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>It depends on the "rules" (or law) of what happens if somebody does step on them, I think to some extent. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>Not much. The sign only says "Please keep out" & I've never heard of anybody being prosecuted for going in there - at the most they've been asked / told to please leave. (Having said that, it's definitely <i>not</i> a spot I'd go into by choice! It's quite common to see reports of Eastern Brown snakes <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_brown_snake">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_brown_snake</a> being spotted sunning themselves right beside those little patches of <strike>bush</strike> scrub!)</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Much of what is being discussed here (bushes, shrubbery, sea grass on dunes...) is about land COVER.<br>
<br>
In the meantime, keeping distinctions firmly in mind between land use and land cover remains a very important thing to do. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, as mentioned earlier in the discussion.</div><div><br></div><div>landuse= should be restricted to those "several" features that the land is actually used for eg residential, commercial, industrial, military & a "few" more. <br></div><div><br></div><div>landcover= should be what is actually on the ground inside that area of usage, be it grass, trees or whatever.</div><div></div><div>
<br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Thanks<div><br></div><div>Graeme</div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div></div>