<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 10:52, Anne-Karoline Distel <<a href="mailto:annekadistel@web.de">annekadistel@web.de</a>> wrote:</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>(On a related matter, there are mass paths in Ireland, tracks/
footways that were only used to go to church.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If they are not public footpaths (some will be) then these can be mapped</div><div>with appropriate access restrictions.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div> I need to read up
more about it, because that is another thing the council wants to
map. I don't know if they lead to holy wells as well. I have only
mapped one and used name=Mass path, but I'm not sure if that is
sufficient.)<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Your council's mapping requirements seem to be getting more and more</div><div>esoteric. Would it be better to let them use uMap for these things?</div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Paul</div><div><br></div></div></div>