<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><br><br><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 19 Feb 2021, at 01:09, Bert -Araali- Van Opstal <bert.araali.afritastic@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">There are religions where a place of worship is not a
building, but a natural feature.</div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>I am well aware of this, but we’re speaking about religion=christian here, so it seems straight to apply christian requirements for place of worship. I am not sure a building is required for a christian place of worship, I guess not, although other sites are definitely exceptions. For example a quick search has yielded this result, which btw is near a holy well: <a href="https://www.kuladig.de/Objektansicht/O-83218-20140108-3">https://www.kuladig.de/Objektansicht/O-83218-20140108-3</a></div><div>The text says it is supposedly a Germanic ritual site.</div><div><br></div><div>AFAIK there is the consecrated ground concept (for example a church that gets disused can become desecrated), maybe this is the thing to look at when deciding the well tags? We’re using its limits when drawing the pow polygon for a church place of worship.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin </div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>