<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
As I wrote on the discussion page, the workaround for the splitting
of consecutive ways with wait:lane would be to consider the "action
point" on the last segment and/or before the junction.<br>
But this was a problem that I wasn't really aware of when I started
the proposal and launched the discussion, mainly because the
examples I knew (in the proposal page) are very straightforward and
don't offer much complexity.<br>
The main theme of controversial, though, was that some mappers think
this should be a feature used in points, which I'm against.<br>
If I ever make a new proposal, I'll try to address and explain those
problems better.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
António.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Às 08:12 de 19/02/2021, Mateusz
Konieczny via Tagging escreveu:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MTtzMru--3-2@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>In some cases it would.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>See <a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/65/Wait-lanes_example.jpg"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/65/Wait-lanes_example.jpg</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>lets say that left-to-right way has three lanes:<br>
</div>
<div>one for turning left<br>
</div>
<div>one for going straight<br>
</div>
<div>one for turning right<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>case 1) on second (right) crossing left turn lane has stop
sign<br>
</div>
<div>applying only to it<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>case 2) both on first and second crossing left turn lane <br>
</div>
<div>has stop sign applying only to it<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>To distinguish between this cases you need to split way.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In general way splitting introduces bunch of nasty corner
cases<br>
</div>
<div>that seems to be not considered.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Feb 19, 2021, 09:06 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:simon@poole.ch">simon@poole.ch</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<p>I'm not convinced that the information that this proposal
would add is actually worth the trouble, but most of the
arguments against it would seem to be have centred around that
the proposal itself wasn't clear enough that it was simply
proposing an extension to normal lane tagging. For example it
wouldn't have required any way splitting over what is already
necessary for correct lane tagging. <br>
</p>
<div class="">Am 18.02.2021 um 13:18 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny
via Tagging:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/wait"
rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/wait</a>
vote ended<br>
</div>
<div>with 7 votes for and 9 votes against, rejecting this
proposal.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<pre class="" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" class="" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>