<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><br><br><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 26 Feb 2021, at 16:12, Paul Allen <pla16021@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>I just googled for your proposal to check if you had mentioned</div><div>inscription=*. Instead of your proposal I found <br></div><div><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dtomb">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dtomb</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Looks like the horse has already bolted</div></div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>yeah, the current procedure is just pro forma, as I’d rather like the proposal to be approved than abandoned :)</div><div>The tag is already in use, the proposal is from 2011...</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for your clarification of terms. So a tumulus would contain several burial chambers but they could not be called graves.</div><div><br></div><div> Could a sepulchre be seen a subclass of tomb or vice versa?</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin </div></div></body></html>