<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>27 Feb 2021, 08:36 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone<br></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 27 Feb 2021, at 00:07, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">In that case, can't you just mark it as "In use"?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>that’s what I used to do, but a few years ago people started to argue that „in use“ was for tag documentation, not for proposals, and that proposals which aren’t voted become „abandoned“<br></div><div>See also <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/tombs" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/tombs</a>#Status<br></div></blockquote><div>If proposal is inactive and tag is used,<br></div><div>then another option is to create page</div><div>documenting fee facto page and <br></div><div>use <br></div><div>https<a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Archived_proposal">://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Archived_proposal</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>This way proposal will be still available <br></div><div>and will be unlikely to be confused for</div><div>description of actual use</div> </body>
</html>