<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div>Feb 25, 2021, 21:27 by bert.araali.afritastic@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p><span class="font" style="font-family:Verdana">The standard highway tagging is mainly based
on the physical appearance. Not the functional or just partly
the socio-economic importance.</span><br></p></blockquote><div>Definitely no. Standard highway tagging is de facto based on mix of functional role,<br></div><div>official classification, physical appearance and preferences/opinions of mappers.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And all of that is definitely correlated.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is supposed to match functional role, but official classification is sometimes used insted<br></div><div>(especially highway=trunk suffers from that, in many/most? places used to represent<br></div><div>exspressways).<br></div> </body>
</html>