<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"></div></div></div></div></div>Marc, sorry for the slow response. I lost a friend to cancer on Monday so I'm not real focussed on maps & mapping right at the moment :-(</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div>As a result, some of my answers may be a little brisk so please accept my apologies in advance - I certainly don't want to offend!</div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 at 20:54, Marc_marc <<a href="mailto:marc_marc@mailo.com">marc_marc@mailo.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
I would rather see a "rational" section with only :<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Sorry, this seems to be getting down to concerns over how the page is formatted rather than the proposal itself? Maybe this is another change we need to the Proposal Page wiki - what goes where?</div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Besides it would be nice to match the new tags in the list of deprecated<br>
tags. old tag A -> new tag B+C<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Everything will become emergency=lifeguard or lifeguard=yes.</div><div><br></div><div>Details of buildings etc are recommended but optional, & will depend on just what the facility is.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
for example emergency=water_rescue_station becomes office=lifeguard.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It wouldn't. As mentioned earlier ^, a WRS will become emergncy=lifeguard + either lifeguard=base or lifeguard=tower, depending on it's size</div><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
and for emergency=lifeguard_base ? it is not a place where you can<br>
access a rescue service, it's more a kind of landuse necessary for the<br>
rescue tower/platteformm to work.<br>
If my understanding is correct, it is quite inconsistent that it becomes<br>
"emergency=lifeguard where a lifeguard will be while on duty", isn't it<br>
rather an organizational area ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>From my experience, at <i>any</i> time that a lifeguard / lifesaver patrol is on the beach, there are invariably other lifeguards at their Base, maintaining equipment, training, taking a break, preparing for or just finished a shift, manning the comm's room etc</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
On the other hand, since the value =yes is by convention the indefinite<br>
value that groups together all the others, it would be nice to have a<br>
precise value for mobile structures, </blockquote><div><br></div><div>But how do we map a mobile structure that may be right here today, 200 m north of here tomorrow, then 200 m south the next day? isn't one of the basic principles of OSM that we only map fixed items?</div><div><br></div><div>
Thanks<div><br></div><div>Graeme</div></div><br></div></div>