<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mar 6, 2021, 09:57 by marc_marc@mailo.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hello,<br></div><div><br></div><div>Le 06.03.21 à 07:47, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :<br></div><blockquote><div>landcover=water is a tag<br></div><div>duplicating more widely used tags such<br></div><div>as natural=water, waterway=riverbank etc<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Just because there are tags describing landuse + tags<br></div><div>describing leisure activities + "amenity tag" that together<br></div><div>cover (or not) all possible uses of a water surface,<br></div><div>does not mean that they are tags with the same meaning.<br></div></blockquote><div>Is there any case where natural=water can not be added<br></div><div>and adding landcover=water would be OK and useful?<br></div><div><br></div><div>If for swimming pools areas someone is adding landcover=water<br></div><div>- why it would be superior to adding natural=water?<br></div><div><br></div><div>What is gained from having a new tag here?<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>The question seems to me to be badly put, it would be like<br></div><div>saying "should one who wants to add a shop also be obliged<br></div><div>to add the building"<br></div></blockquote><div>It would be rather equivalent to <br></div><div>"I see object=building tag, can we mark it as deprecated"<br></div><div><br></div><div>What is the benefit of landcover=water over using natural=water?<br></div><div>Is there any? <br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>