<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body dir="auto">I'm not found of external ids in OSM, but I don't really care about cemeteries, so I don't really bother. <br><br>However, a few open questions: I wonder if the other way around is doable: extend findagrave data with geo coordinates picked from OSM map. At least we could hope that their users might add or maintain cemeteries in OSM and enrich our data. <br>Also, what about licensing? Their data is crowdsourced, sure, but is it open? If not, are we allowed to use their ids? Do we feel like to? <br>Yves <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 13 mars 2021 23:57:08 GMT+01:00, Seth Price via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="auto">From the page: “It [must contain] at least one valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wikidata, Wikispecies, Wikiversity, or Wikimedia Commons.”</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">So, it boils down to one of the original concerns: WP’s notability policy itself. Find A Grave has no such policy, and in fact has no problem with adding, say, the burial location of your pet catfish if you so please. If this wasn’t a problem, I’d actually go with Wikidata as it’s already established in OSM.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Also, please excuse my reply being on top; I'm responding from mobile at the moment and have no idea how to change it.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div id="composer_signature" dir="auto"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">—Seth Price</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><br></div><div align="left" dir="auto" style="font-size:100%;color:#000000"><div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> </div><div>Date: 3/13/21 11:01 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" <tagging@openstreetmap.org> </div><div>Cc: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz@tutanota.com> </div><div>Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Find A Grave cemetery and grave IDs </div><div><br></div></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mar 13, 2021, 09:07 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;" class="tutanota_quote"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 12 Mar 2021, at 11:00, Marc_marc <marc_marc@mailo.com> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>and expect the justified remark that it's not necessary to put the refs<br></div><div>of all the bases in the world, wikidata can perfectly serve as a unique<br></div><div>identifier to link all the bases<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>could be an option. Not sure thousands or millions of individual graves are sufficiently relevant for wikidata to justify entering there (wikidata has different criteria for inclusion than OpenStreetMap)<br></div></blockquote><div><a href="https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Notability">https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Notability</a> if someone is interested<br></div><div>(have not checked whatever grave would pass it, not sure how it is implemented in practice)<br></div><div><br></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>