<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt'>
<p>Sorry for getting our own abbreviation wrong: this should have been "...one of the weak points of OSM"...</p>
<p>Am 18.03.2021 18:47, schrieb mail@marcos-martinez.net:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<p>This topic perfectly reflects one of the weak points OMS: Data consistency. Coming up with new tags is perfectly fine if you try to reflect reality in a way we couldn't before. Just starting to use a new tag that very easily can get confused with an existing one implies a high risk of getting "corrected". Situation nowadays is: The standard to indicate a POI reference on the internet where people can consult further information is "Webpage", no discussion about that. People, myself included, haven't thought about the definition of what a webpage vs website is.</p>
<p>- Someone thinks this is not the right terminology?</p>
<p>Let's discuss it, agree on the right one and deprecate the other.</p>
<p>- Someone believes it makes sense to make the distinction?</p>
<p>Let's discuss it and if we agree we document it and try to promote the new scheme.</p>
<p>Until any of these options has happened I believe nobody can be blamed for trying to keep the database clean.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Marcos (Mar Mar)</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p>Am 18.03.2021 14:51, schrieb Paul Allen:</p>
<blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0;">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 13:45, Robin Burek <<a href="mailto:robin.burek@gmx.de">robin.burek@gmx.de</a>> wrote:</div>
<div dir="ltr"> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><span><span><span>Overall, I would assume that there are no automatic edits here, but rather a good quality management tool is used.</span></span><span><span> </span></span><span><span>I would - even if it is perhaps wrong from a linguistic point of view - primarily (if it is the only list on the Internet) to display such pages under "website" - here you just have to think about the data consumer.</span></span></span></div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Long, long ago you could have made the argument that everything should be</div>
<div>website=*. But now we can tag wikipedia webpages. Facebook user/group</div>
<div>pages. And images (I've seen a couple of website that consist entirely of</div>
<div>an image with text on it). So the data consumer already has several</div>
<div>things to check for rather than assuming that if it's accessible to a web</div>
<div>browser then we've tagged it as website=*. Or should we move all</div>
<div>of those under website=*?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>--</div>
<div>Paul</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<br />
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace;">_______________________________________________<br /> Tagging mailing list<br /> <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br /> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a></div>
</blockquote>
<p><br /></p>
<!-- html ignored --><br />
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">_______________________________________________<br /> Tagging mailing list<br /> <a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br /> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a></div>
</blockquote>
<p><br /></p>
</body></html>