<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Mar 22, 2021, 17:22 by frederik@remote.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>On 22.03.21 16:42, mail@marcos-martinez.net wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>Hi Frederik, I couldn't disagree more. First of all because it is<br></div><div>incoherent with nowadays reality. What you are saying is that there<br></div><div>should be/are basically no enforceable tagging rules because I see they<br></div><div>are being enforced from time to time. Enforceable in the sense of<br></div><div>someone tagging against established consensus (whatever this is and<br></div><div>however this is measured)<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Exactly.<br></div><div><br></div><div>There can be established consensus.<br></div><div><br></div><div>But consensus cannot be established by calling for a vote on the tagging<br></div><div>list and assuming that whatever those 30 people say is then the<br></div><div>established consensus.<br></div></blockquote><div>Though vote/tagging mailing list/other discussion channels are<br></div><div>often useful for checking whether some change makes sense at all<br></div><div>- is it widely supported or widely considered as a bad idea.<br></div><div><br></div><div>And it often makes sense to ask before starting to use some new<br></div><div>tagging schema - because once widespread it may be too late<br></div><div>to fix some obvious problems.<br></div> </body>
</html>