<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/3/21 9:02 pm, Mateusz Konieczny
via Tagging wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MWhz5op--3-2@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Mar 25, 2021, 22:22 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:f@zz.de">f@zz.de</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Hi,<br>
</div>
<div>i got into a discussion whether cemetery parking belongs
within the<br>
</div>
<div>landuse=cemetery (Which i think it does) and the mapper
changing<br>
</div>
<div>that pointed me to tag:landuse=cemetery which does indeed
state<br>
</div>
<div>that "nearby parking" should not be within that landuse. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>It may be a cultural issue (I heard that in USA in some cases
you<br>
</div>
<div>drive car into cemetery itself), and I guess that "nearby
parking"<br>
</div>
<div>is important part. What about "internal parking"?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Here are two in Australia that you can drive into and park your
car along the roads or at the internal car park/s. <br>
</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175704404#map=17/-33.79227/151.14067">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175704404#map=17/-33.79227/151.14067</a></p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174344846#map=16/-33.8757/151.0571">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174344846#map=16/-33.8757/151.0571</a></p>
<p>Yes crematorium, chapels, cafe, etc are part of the cemeteries
and should be mapped as such, to do otherwise would lower the
quality of the OSM data. .</p>
<p>These things are not 'nearby' but internal to the grounds. <br>
</p>
<br>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>