<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 28/3/21 6:28 am, Peter Elderson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+vON8X3tjZVNXm9-63uDak4YJeXkaq9O+AG4RbVzt8d4Q@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">s/allows/describes/<br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Let
mappers choose the best fitting option in each case.\</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Yep.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I have chosen to go to a cemetery for lunch, on a few occasionsÂ
- a quite area without distractions and few visitors. <br>
</p>
<p>If your after some peace and quite they can be very pleasant,
more so than a park. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The absolute removal of parking areas from mapping cemeteries is
wrong, as would be the absolute inclusion of parking areas in
mapped cemeteries. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Best to let the locals decide what is or is not included/excluded
... for any landuse. <br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>