<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13/4/21 6:43 pm, Andy Townsend
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:45f4c394-e28e-eea6-010d-6c7409a86cd3@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13/04/2021 05:52, Graeme
Fitzpatrick wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXrTd3kiwNMCm9QN8zoNxsfaf2WF9V=9tWOuHkrPSNJrrQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>As part of the military=bases proposal, military=barracks
were correctly re-defined as the buildings where military
personnel live & sleep only, rather than being used to
describe the entire base area.</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Or perhaps "incorrectly redefined"? Your page seems to
contradict itself - at the top it says:</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote type="cite">
<ul>
<li><tt dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
style="white-space:nowrap"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building"
title="Key:building" moz-do-not-send="true">building</a></bdi>=*</tt>
<i>mandatory when the area is a single building</i></li>
<li><tt dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
style="white-space:nowrap"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse"
title="Key:landuse" moz-do-not-send="true">landuse</a></bdi>=<a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmilitary"
title="Tag:landuse=military" moz-do-not-send="true"><bdi>military</bdi></a></tt>
<i>mandatory when the area is not just one building</i></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
and lower down it says:
<p> </p>
<blockquote type="cite">Prior to January 2021, this tag was
defined as "Military barracks where soldiers live and work", and
on older features this tag may still have this meaning, which is
similar to the newer tag <tt dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"
style="background:#EEF;font-size:1em;line-height:1.6"><bdi
style="white-space:nowrap"><a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:military"
title="Key:military" moz-do-not-send="true">military</a></bdi>=<a
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dbase"
title="Tag:military=base" moz-do-not-send="true"><bdi>base</bdi></a></tt>.
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>So which part of your page is correct - the top part (which
would make your complaint about iD moot) or the bottom part
(which seems to try and redefine a tag that has an existing
meaning in OSM, which is surely a mistake)?</p>
<p>What iD does seems compliant with what the top part of what
your page says, and also with how I personally would always have
mapped a military barracks (but probably never have).</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Yes, bit mixed. I would think <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>building=military - mandatory, with <br>
</p>
<p>military=barracks - mandatory on the same way/node as the above
building.<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Then <br>
</p>
<p>landuse=military mandatory on the surrounding area, how big that
area is depends on the military base. A one building barracks
would still be a military area? <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I would not refer to the past, just when this tag was redefined,
reduces confusion by not mentioning the past definition. <br>
</p>
<p>And yes, I would simply delete the confusing test. <br>
</p>
</body>
</html>