<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Apr 13, 2021, 09:18 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 13 Apr 2021, at 06:57, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>As part of the military=bases proposal, military=barracks were correctly re-defined as the buildings where military personnel live & sleep only, rather than being used to describe the entire base area.<br></div><div><br></div><div>However, iD still has the previous default that landuse=military is mandatory for mapping military=barracks.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>can you explain more thoroughly the nature of the problem? To me, sleeping quarters for soldiers would seem to fit with landuse=military.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Note that military=barracks can be within (one of parts of) landuse=military.<br></div><div><br></div><div>In such case creating landuse=military within landuse=military seems undesirable to me.<br></div> </body>
</html>