<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 20/4/21 4:30 am, Mateusz Konieczny
via Tagging wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:MYfOMqi--B-2@tutanota.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Apr 19, 2021, 10:41 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div class="">To me landuse=forest is for the human use of the
land .. it does not say 'here be trees'. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Note that in general mismatches how this tag is actually used<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid
#93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;">
<div class=""><br>
</div>
<div class="">So the landuse does not change where trees have
been havested, it remains the same landuse. <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>If this areas will be replanted soon (or trees regrow
naturally) for pragmatic reasons it would<br>
</div>
<div>make sense to do it anyway.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Only in areas with many local mappers focusing on their area
it<br>
</div>
<div>would make sense to delete (parts of) forest just to recreate
it months/year later.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<p>So there is no way to tag an "area used for timber production,
regardless of current tree cover".</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>