<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 4, 2021, 06:35 by graemefitz1@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="" dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><br></div></div></div></div></div></div><div>Nice work, Kyle!<br></div><div><br></div><div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 13:23, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Though I really appreciate<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">> survey_point:condition=destroyed is not proposed. If the survey marker no<br></div><div dir="auto">> longer exists, it should be deleted from OSM.<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Wondering about this one?<br></div><div><br></div><div>To prevent armchair mapping of old points that have been identified as no longer existing, or to stop somebody wandering around looking for a point that "should" be here, would it be better to leave these tagged as demolished (destroyed?):survey_point=yes?<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Situation with for example buildings is different, people are unlikely to armchair map survey points.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">At least that is what I expect.<br></div> </body>
</html>