<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jun 7, 2021, 11:43 by hufkratzer@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>On 07.06.2021 11:10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br></div><blockquote><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 7 Jun 2021, at 10:40, Robin Burek<robin.burek@gmx.de> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is also about saying that "leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian + building=*" is deprecated.' and so on....<br></div></blockquote><div>this combination seems invalid rather than deprecated. A pitch cannot be a building, there might be a pitch in a building, but they cannot be tagged on the same object<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Then how would you map the examples that I mentioned initially where the building has nearly the same size as the riding arena:<br></div><div>1. building=tent (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Equitent_textile_Reithalle.jpg)<br></div><div>2. building=roof (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjVCeE-4Ht0)<br></div><div>I assume one should not draw two areas of the same size one on top of the other. A node for the pitch although the dimensions are known?<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">a) node for pitch<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">b) smaller area for pitch than for building (it is smaller than building, right?)<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">c) actually tagging both on one object, it is poor idea but not worse than popular<br></div><div dir="auto">merging of shop and building into one OSM object<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">d) resuse way with multipolygons (an excellent way to confuse mappers, likely<br></div><div dir="auto">the worst one)<br></div> </body>
</html>