<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">07.06.2021 14:08, Mateusz Konieczny via
Tagging:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:MbaMvzh--3-2@tutanota.com" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jun 7, 2021, 11:43 by <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:hufkratzer@gmail.com">hufkratzer@gmail.com</a>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="tutanota_quote">
<div>On 07.06.2021 11:10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>sent from a phone<br>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div>On 7 Jun 2021, at 10:40, Robin Burek<a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:robin.burek@gmx.de"><robin.burek@gmx.de></a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It is also about saying that "leisure=pitch +
sport=equestrian + building=*" is deprecated.' and so
on....<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>this combination seems invalid rather than deprecated. A
pitch cannot be a building, there might be a pitch in a
building, but they cannot be tagged on the same object<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers Martin<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Then how would you map the examples that I mentioned
initially where the building has nearly the same size as the
riding arena:<br>
</div>
<div>1. building=tent (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Equitent_textile_Reithalle.jpg">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Equitent_textile_Reithalle.jpg</a>)<br>
</div>
<div>2. building=roof (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjVCeE-4Ht0">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjVCeE-4Ht0</a>)<br>
</div>
<div>I assume one should not draw two areas of the same size one
on top of the other. A node for the pitch although the
dimensions are known?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div dir="auto">a) node for pitch<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">b) smaller area for pitch than for building (it is
smaller than building, right?)<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">c) actually tagging both on one object, it is poor
idea but not worse than popular<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">merging of shop and building into one OSM object<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The wiki page for key:shop has no "How to map" section, but the page
for shop=mall has one, and it says that a shopping mall can have the
tag building=retail. If a shopping mall can be a building why can't
another shop be a building? This is not so clear to me. But I have
to agree that a pitch can never be a building, it can only be in a
building or under a roof. So I rather disagree and think that
leisure=pitch + building=* on one object is worse than shop=* and
building=* on one object and should not be recommended. OTOH the
wiki page "One feature, one OSM element" says "<span style="color:
rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 17.5px;
font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal;
font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing:
normal; orphans: 2; text-align: left; text-indent: 0px;
text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2;
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness:
initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial; display: inline !important; float: none;">If the building
has a clear primary feature [...], the primary feature can be
tagged on the building itself </span><span style="color: rgb(32,
33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 17.5px; font-style:
normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal;
font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align:
left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal;
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); text-decoration-thickness:
initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color:
initial; display: inline !important; float: none;">[...]".</span>
So is it allowed nevertheless? What do you think?<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:MbaMvzh--3-2@tutanota.com" type="cite">
<div dir="auto">d) resuse way with multipolygons (an excellent way
to confuse mappers, likely<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">the worst one)<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
And what about the first discussed solution: Draw one area on top of
the other (overlapping ways reusing the same nodes)? It's easier to
do than b) and d), unless a) gives information about the sizes and
makes more sense that c). Can we remommend that?<br>
</body>
</html>