<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hello,</p>
    <p>Totally agreeing with this, additionally I would say that there
      doesn't seem to be any issue in mapping giant furniture, the vote
      only shows that a different tag would be more consensual.</p>
    <p>If you have enough energy and motivation to propose changes and
      come back with a different tagging solution, this would be best
      solution for everyone : a properly documented tag that fits
      community needs. But as these proposal process can be really
      time/energy consuming, there is no need to hurry or even to go for
      it. Take care of yourself before taking care of what wiki
      community wants ;-)</p>
    <p>Best regards,<br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Adrien P.</pre>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 18/06/2021 à 12:19, Martin
      Koppenhoefer a écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CABPTjTCNQNubCeQq15KPOG+Mo7qvxajZ3--6oFYUZ3tOTn6L4A@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um
            07:03 Uhr schrieb Francesco Ansanelli <<a
              href="mailto:francians@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">francians@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="auto">the proposal was rejected with 9 votes for
              and 19 votes against.</div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>sorry for this</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div> </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="auto">
              <div dir="auto"><br>
              </div>
              <div dir="auto">I won't redraft it and will not map (and
                probably delete from OSM) such features since no valid
                tagging exists...</div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>you should not delete any tags from OSM just because a
          proposal for their definition has been rejected, particularly
          if there aren't any (supposedly) synonymous tags established.</div>
        <div>By definition, any use of undocumented tags is valid (any
          tags you like). <br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>There seems to be a misconception, what got rejected was
          your prosal for a definition, not the tag. ;-)<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Cheers,<br>
        </div>
        <div>Martin<br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>