<div dir="auto"><div>Hello,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">thanks Mateusz, Martin and Adrien.</div><div dir="auto">In this case I'll change wrongly mapped objects (not massively) and collect some more examples for future reference... But I'm reluctant to do a new proposal so far, since I can find the time to reply everyone in a decent manner only sometimes.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Cheers</div><div dir="auto">Francesco</div><div dir="auto"><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il ven 18 giu 2021, 12:45 PanierAvide <<a href="mailto:panieravide@riseup.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">panieravide@riseup.net</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Totally agreeing with this, additionally I would say that there
doesn't seem to be any issue in mapping giant furniture, the vote
only shows that a different tag would be more consensual.</p>
<p>If you have enough energy and motivation to propose changes and
come back with a different tagging solution, this would be best
solution for everyone : a properly documented tag that fits
community needs. But as these proposal process can be really
time/energy consuming, there is no need to hurry or even to go for
it. Take care of yourself before taking care of what wiki
community wants ;-)</p>
<p>Best regards,<br>
</p>
<pre cols="72">Adrien P.</pre>
<div>Le 18/06/2021 à 12:19, Martin
Koppenhoefer a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um
07:03 Uhr schrieb Francesco Ansanelli <<a href="mailto:francians@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">francians@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">the proposal was rejected with 9 votes for
and 19 votes against.</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>sorry for this</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I won't redraft it and will not map (and
probably delete from OSM) such features since no valid
tagging exists...</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>you should not delete any tags from OSM just because a
proposal for their definition has been rejected, particularly
if there aren't any (supposedly) synonymous tags established.</div>
<div>By definition, any use of undocumented tags is valid (any
tags you like). <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There seems to be a misconception, what got rejected was
your prosal for a definition, not the tag. ;-)<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,<br>
</div>
<div>Martin<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>