<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Value in from and in to are not necessarily the closest named object to<br></div><div dir="auto">terminal locations, therefore adding them has some value as deriving<br></div><div dir="auto">them automatically is not feasible.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Even if deriving them automatically was possible then adding redundant<br></div><div dir="auto">tag is preferable if that discourages adding fake descriptive name tags<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jul 4, 2021, 15:18 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Which reinforces my point of them adding no value as OSM is
geospatial. <br></div><div> <br></div><div> <br></div><div class="">On 02/07/2021 14:27, Peter Elderson
wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>I think from and to, as currently used in routes,
are labels for end users and operators, not exact geolocations. <br></div><div><br></div><div>from=<named or labeled point> to=<named or labeled
point>. <br></div><div><br></div><div><div><br></div><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="" dir="ltr">Vr gr Peter Elderson<br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>