<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><font face="Verdana">I also ask the same question again , in most
poorer countries without proper piped water supplies ALL waters
are used to bath, bathe (swim), laundry, car wash, fetching
drinking and cooking water etc... . I do remember that in most
other countries in Europe the same applies, people are free to
access public waters unless signposted otherwise, good idea or
not. We don't need this tag.</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">I stick with "</font>We don't map nature
baths without signage (it is not verifiable) other than the
surface, e.g. sand, rock and the paths/roads leading to it. There
must be a sign as a bare minimum to tag it using the tags below."
as in our wiki.<br>
If you feel the need to do otherwise you could attempt to change
this statement and use an additional amenity=public_bath or
nature_bath ? Doesn't seem good idea to me people go for nature
bathing to be private, not the ones commonly known, cliff diving
etc... all different interest groups and different intentions
using natural features. Compare it with other "sports" not
practised in a place modified by humans.<br>
</p>
<p>Greetings,</p>
<p>Bert Araali<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/07/2021 14:37,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gruebel2020@online.de">gruebel2020@online.de</a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:47c3f2c0-6870-5bc4-37c7-afdc68228b3a@online.de">Voting
on "Reworking leisure=bathing place" has ended. It was rejected
with 9 votes against and 8 votes for (3 abstentions).
<br>
<br>
A large part of the votes against the proposal is because of the
poor verifiability. In my opinion the places that are meant in
this proposal are clear and verifiable. I had tried to set up many
rules to make this clear for others. Apparently these were not
sufficient or poorly defined by me.
<br>
<br>
I would revise the proposal in the future and propose it again. I
am wondering if you have any ideas to improve the verifiability.
<br>
Maybe you have other images that could act as examples. I know
several places, but unfortunately I have hardly taken any pictures
of them so far.
<br>
<br>
I am still convinced that these locations have sufficient
frequency and relevance to continue working on them.
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
Tagging mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>