<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07.07.2021 15:13, Michele Galimberti
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPzw1EfjRmFW8VP0X-k72wvDxROmv3NSbv+1qtMLpWBC98Z5vA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"> That sounds good to me. It
could apply to other practice pitches too. Much more
preferable than abusing the sport with sport=practice_tennis
like we have with sport=cricket_nets. <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dcricket_nets"
target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dcricket_nets</a></blockquote>
<div>Yes, I agree. We have two possibilities now:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> sport=tennis<br>
leisure=pitch <br>
pitch=training_wall </div>
<div>
<div>or</div>
<div><span class="gmail-im">
<div> <span class="gmail-im">sport=tennis</span> </div>
<div>leisure=practice_pitch<br>
tennis=wall</div>
</span></div>
<span class="gmail-im">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I like the second a little more, because we avoid the
problem of people/software assuming that
leisure=pitch+sport=* is a full pitch and because
pitch=training_wall would be used almost exclusively for
tennis (like Pelota, that uses pitch only as it's their
main pitch type).</div>
<div> <span class="gmail-im">leisure=practice_pitch</span>
could instead be used in other sports too, and wall would
go under the tennis tag.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I'd go with that and start preparing the proposal if
everyone agrees<br>
</div>
</span><br>
<span class="gmail-im">
<div> </div>
</span> </div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
How would you define leisure=practice_pitch in general? I assume
many OSM pitches are used only for practice/training. For example,
sport+equestrian + leisure=pitch is currently often used for round
pens, lungeing areas and sometimes added to horse_walker's.<br>
- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_pen">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Round_pen</a><br>
- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longeing">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longeing</a><br>
- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:animal=horse_walker">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:animal=horse_walker</a><br>
Will these have to be retagged to leisure=practice_pitch?<br>
<br>
For what is tennis=wall needed? Woudn't leisure=practice_pitch +
sport=tennis be clear enough? (You can map the building=wall
separately as a detail) It sounds strange as a subcategory of
sport=tennis; tennis=wall_tennis would be more appropriate IMHO.<br>
<br>
Someone looking for places to play tennis will likely search for
"sport = tennis" in general and then find both tag combinations.
Perhapy this could be avoided by better using something like:<br>
<br>
practice:sport=tennis + leisure=*<br>
or<br>
practice_only:sport=tennis + leisure=*<br>
<br>
Such a prefix could also be used for all kinds of sports, if it
makes sense.<br>
</body>
</html>