<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><font face="Verdana">I think this is more feasible and surely
also from my side desirable.<br>
When doing this please keep in mind, that in many countries,
especially less financial powerful countries, the exact size and
shape (referring as to if its evenly flat, type of surface, has
holes or not) as for international competitions might not be
always strictly adhered to, yet those pitches are used, with
consensus of the local communities, to play "full" matches. So
to be as inclusive as possible, take this in consideration.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Verdana">Good luck !<br>
</font></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/07/2021 19:53, Michele Galimberti
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPzw1EdX9E-oQd+e0UTMmwP0dp0O8HRc=PgkF9S=-9b1P3nPbw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>After collecting comments here, on the talk page and on
Discord, I'm beginning to think that before this proposal can
go on, a consensus on practice pitches, namely how to tag
those pitches where the "full" sport (and even here there can
be some discussion) can't be played.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cases such as tennis walls and batting cages in baseball
might need a full tag (like the proposed
leisure=practice_pitch or a pitch=practice subtag) or they
might be included under leisure=pitch on a per-sport basis
(like in basket with the use of hoops=*). In any case, I think
a decision on this bigger question should be made, and after
that the particular cases can be discussed. What are your
thoughts on this?<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno mer 14 lug 2021 alle
ore 22:43 Martin Koppenhoefer <<a
href="mailto:dieterdreist@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">dieterdreist@gmail.com</a>> ha
scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
sent from a phone<br>
<br>
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 17:24, Michele Galimberti <<a
href="mailto:galimbertimichele@gmail.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">galimbertimichele@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Why ways and relations shouldn't be used is
self-explanatory and doesn't need an explanation in this case,
I think.<br>
<br>
<br>
On relations you can use any tags, because you can use any
type of relation and you don’t know what kind of relations
people are coming up with, for example you could make a site
relation tag it with leisure=practice_pitch and add a wall to
it. The wiki about use on relations is more informative (is
the tag used on relations?) than prescriptive and I’m not sure
how much sense there is in asking this for a proposal.<br>
<br>
Cheers Martin <br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tagging mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org">Tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>