<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
Why and how do you think cultivated can be mis-used? Maybe we can adjust the proposal based on that. The reason why natural=shrubs was not used in the first shrubbery proposal was that the three mentioned values are almost the same words. That might cause confusion. </div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
Also, I remember a lot of people beeing agains natural=shrubbery because they wanted to extend natural=scrub to keep it simple and that it was not always clear when to use scrub or shrubbery. How does natural=shrubs deal with that?</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>Van:</b> Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1@gmail.com><br>
<b>Verzonden:</b> vrijdag 23 juli 2021 5:12<br>
<b>Aan:</b> Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org><br>
<b>Onderwerp:</b> Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Shrubbery V2</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_attr">On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 23:54, Peter Elderson <<a href="mailto:pelderson@gmail.com">pelderson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">For now, I would welcome an explicit consensus that
<div>* <b>landuse</b> maps the use of the land,</div>
<div>* <b>natural</b> maps areas or objects that grow or flow of themselves, whether the object or its growth or flow is [hu]man[aged|_made] or not. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yep!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div></div>
<div>So now, closing in on the various shrubbery and scrub proposals, I think natural=scrub
<b>(area)</b>, natural=shrub (node), natural=shrubs (area), </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think those three, (with mentioning that =scrub should also be an area) sum it up nicely, together with
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>density=* specifies the density of the shrubs for the area. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>"cultivated" isn't a bad idea, but I can see it being mis-used badly <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> Thanks
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Graeme</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>