<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sep 29, 2021, 13:33 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Am Di., 28. Sept. 2021 um 21:23 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org">tagging@openstreetmap.org</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>2) I am not convinced at all that <br></div><div dir="auto">landuse:secondary=*, landuse:tertiary=*, landuse:quaternary=*<br></div><div dir="auto">is better than overlapping landuses<br></div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>there is a difference in semantics though, secondary, tertiary, etc. indicate a hierarchy, while overlapping landuse objects don't. Not implying that one is worse than the other, but they aren't equivalent.<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">And it is partially my reason!<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">With one landuse dominating - map just one.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">With multiple landuse applying clearly at once - map overlapping areas.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">In case where you are unable to select primary one, landuse:secondary<br></div><div dir="auto">would be even more problematic than overlapping landuses or selecting<br></div><div dir="auto">just one.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>