<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>A place node is effectively (and usually literally) the same as the label role. If the label role is deprecated, we should also delete place nodes and move the tags to boundary relations wherever they are present. <br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sep 29, 2021, 07:53 by dieterdreist@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>sent from a phone<br></div><blockquote><div>On 29 Sep 2021, at 16:30, Alex Iannicelli <atiannicelli@gmail.com> wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>If people agree with making a city node have the `label` role for the city's relation, then what should the `admin_centre` of a city be? The same as `label`? or should we remove the admin_centre for cities?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>„label“ roles should be deprecated, a suggested label position is not geodata. <br></div><div><br></div><div>The centre semantics may be questioned in some cases, but at least there is an intended meaning, and there is some information in these nodes that isn’t in the polygon.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin <br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>