<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Oct 29, 2021, 13:07 by nathancase@outlook.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div class=""><p class="">> highway=pedestrian area=yes<br></p><p class="">> seems to be not fitting for this, in my opinion.<br></p><p class=""><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"> </span><br></p><p class=""><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">I agree. I can see the justification in why it has been done – the mapper wants to show the pedestrian area, rather than just a linear way and this is the only(?) way it’ll get rendered. </span><br></p></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Well, <br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer</a><br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div class=""><div dir="auto"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">However,
the actual object doesn’t really match the highway=pedestrian description. It would seem odd to allow a supplementary tag (area=yes) to change (or ignore) the meaning of the primary tag (highway=pedestrian).</span><br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Yeah, it is a bit unusual.<br></div> </body>
</html>