<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 14.11.2021 um 14:59 schrieb Peter
      Elderson:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+sZ1=oZJ-mWJpNHdyuy61EGeBjyAAZZAXBJFeUXOOyR1w@mail.gmail.com">So,
      named routes / themed routes are regular cycling routes, tagged
      with network=*cn where X=l|r|n|i , and maybe name=*, ref=*,
      symbol, colour. Defined by route-specific symbol markings and name
      signs all along the route. <br>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Yes<br>
      <br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+sZ1=oZJ-mWJpNHdyuy61EGeBjyAAZZAXBJFeUXOOyR1w@mail.gmail.com">
      <div>
        <div>A Node Network route
          ... These routes are aimed at prescribing a route (listing the
          ways to be travelled), rather than calculating a route from A
          to B as routers do.<br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><span class="VIiyi" lang="en"><span class="JLqJ4b ChMk0b"
          data-language-for-alternatives="en"
          data-language-to-translate-into="de" data-phrase-index="0"
          data-number-of-phrases="1"><span>It's the same aim in the
            basic network.<br>
            <br>
          </span></span></span> </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+sZ1=oZJ-mWJpNHdyuy61EGeBjyAAZZAXBJFeUXOOyR1w@mail.gmail.com">
      <div>
        <div>I don't see a clear definition of starting point, ending
          point and markings for your "basic network". </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <div>
      <div>The proposal does not refer to the entire tagging scheme but
        only to this value 'basic_network'.<br>
      </div>
    </div>
    <br>
    The simplest possibility is to have a route begin and end where the
    network branches, i.e. wherever signposts point in 3 or more
    directions. There will be entry junctions, especially at the edge,
    where the signpost <span class="VIiyi" lang="en"><span
        class="JLqJ4b ChMk0b" data-language-for-alternatives="en"
        data-language-to-translate-into="de" data-phrase-index="3"
        data-number-of-phrases="6"><span>only points in one direction.</span></span></span><br>
    <p><span class="VIiyi" lang="en"><span class="JLqJ4b ChMk0b"
          data-language-for-alternatives="en"
          data-language-to-translate-into="de" data-phrase-index="5"
          data-number-of-phrases="6"><span>Everything is analogous to
            the node network, only that the directional signs are not
            given by numbers and the nodes do not have a number<br>
            <br>
          </span></span></span></p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKf=P+sZ1=oZJ-mWJpNHdyuy61EGeBjyAAZZAXBJFeUXOOyR1w@mail.gmail.com">
      <div>
        <div>To me, they look like preferential ways, aimed at getting a
          higher weight for a fitting routing profile. Comparable to
          road classes for motor vehicles. Or a sac scale. <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>No, that's definitely not possible.<br>
      <br>
      The aim is to mark paths that are recommended by official
      signposts for cycling. However, these should be distinguishable
      from the tourist routes.</p>
    <p>b.r.<br>
      Jochen<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>