<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 23, 2021, 11:16 by voschix@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>One important thing (at least for me) that is emerging from this discussion, is an underlying, not documented, assumption that I am making, and that i shared most likely by all of my OSM cycling friends in Italy are sharing, but that some people in this discussion are explicitly not sharing:<br></div><div>bicycle (and hiking ) routes in OSM are touristic routes. They are not geared towards "the safest and fastest connection".<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">bicycle (and hiking ) routes in OSM are signed routes.<br></div><div dir="auto">I believe that it is documented?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Typically it will be touristic route, but safest and fastest connection may also appear.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Note that touristic routes are quite likely to be safe connections (if they designers<br></div><div dir="auto">were competent)<br></div> </body>
</html>