<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 30, 2021, 09:00 by voschix@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto"><div>At the risk of repeating myself: can we acknowledge that having different tagging for commuting cycle routes as opposed to touristic cycle routes would be a big advantage for routing/navigation?<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">oh, I agree<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"> And can we acknowledge that de facto in many European countries and in the US the existing cycle routes in OSM are mostly touristic?<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">I also agree<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"> Hence can we agree on a different tagging scheme for commuting cycle routes?<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">It would make sense.<br></div> </body>
</html>