<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 29, 2021, 09:44 by voschix@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 16:55, Brian M. Sperlongano <<a href="mailto:zelonewolf@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">zelonewolf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 3:53 AM Peter Elderson <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:pelderson@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">pelderson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class=""><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="ltr"><div><div>5. icn, ncn, rcn and lcn are used for recreational routes.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Says who? <br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div dir="auto">Brian, <br></div><div dir="auto">I stated earlier that this is an "in practice" feature, and not documented. It is useful and is used by many routing/navigation tools. <br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">That is caused by fact that most (nearly all) signed bicycle routes are recreational routes.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Not by some ban/limitation to mapping recreational routes.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If some place has signed non-recreational route it is 100% fine to map it as a route.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Though is it even possible to have "international cycle network" that is NOT recreational?<br></div> </body>
</html>