<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
On 29/12/2021 15:31, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d7fe6675-5f78-7673-dcd6-22b01c81b6a3@web.de">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>I noticed that there is a page for <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhaha">barrier=haha</a>
despite the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dditch#Useful_combination">suggestion
of using barrier=ditch + ditch=ha_ha</a> on the Wiki. I would
appreciate one solution and personally favour barrier=haha.
Barrier=haha is not rendered in JOSM or OSM standard layer,
though.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
I thought the accepted way to tag them is barrier=wall, wall=haha
(osmose validator)<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39334123#map=18/51.38667/-2.36843">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39334123#map=18/51.38667/-2.36843</a><br>
<br>
Tagging a ditch seems superfluous to me as it's not a genuine ditch
(the wall prevents access & a ditch can be mapped to describe a
water course) and the inclined ground is *the* defining attribute of
a ha-ha. It doesn't require stating explicitly.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
DaveF<br>
</body>
</html>