<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>The wall doesn't go above ground though, as far as I'm aware. The
ditch is the more dangerous of the barriers in this case.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/12/2021 17:04, Dave F wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:6f3b447a-01b3-caac-b6f9-0fe06824310b@btinternet.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
On 29/12/2021 15:31, Anne-Karoline Distel wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d7fe6675-5f78-7673-dcd6-22b01c81b6a3@web.de">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<p>I noticed that there is a page for <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhaha">barrier=haha</a>
despite the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dditch#Useful_combination">suggestion
of using barrier=ditch + ditch=ha_ha</a> on the Wiki. I
would appreciate one solution and personally favour
barrier=haha. Barrier=haha is not rendered in JOSM or OSM
standard layer, though.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
I thought the accepted way to tag them is barrier=wall, wall=haha
(osmose validator)<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39334123#map=18/51.38667/-2.36843"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39334123#map=18/51.38667/-2.36843</a><br>
<br>
Tagging a ditch seems superfluous to me as it's not a genuine
ditch (the wall prevents access & a ditch can be mapped to
describe a water course) and the inclined ground is *the* defining
attribute of a ha-ha. It doesn't require stating explicitly.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
DaveF<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>