<html><head><style id="outgoing-font-settings">#response_container_BBPPID{font-family: initial; font-size:initial; color: initial;}</style></head><body style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); background-image: initial; line-height: initial;"><div id="response_container_BBPPID" style="outline:none;" dir="auto" contenteditable="false"> <div name="BB10" id="BB10_response_div_BBPPID" dir="auto" style="width:100%;"> See also cemetery=sector which is in use. A common schema would be very powerful.</div> <div name="BB10" id="response_div_spacer_BBPPID" dir="auto" style="width:100%;"> <br style="display:initial"></div> <div id="blackberry_signature_BBPPID" name="BB10" dir="auto"> <div id="_signaturePlaceholder_BBPPID" name="BB10" dir="auto">LeTopographeFou</div> </div></div><div id="_original_msg_header_BBPPID" dir="auto"> <table width="100%" style="border-spacing: 0px; display: table; outline: none;" contenteditable="false"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" style="padding: initial; font-size: initial; text-align: initial;"> <div style="border-right: none; border-bottom: none; border-left: none; border-image: initial; border-top: 1pt solid rgb(181, 196, 223); padding: 3pt 0in 0in; font-family: Tahoma, "BB Alpha Sans", "Slate Pro"; font-size: 10pt;"> <div id="from"><b>De:</b> 61sundowner@gmail.com</div><div id="sent"><b>Envoyé:</b> 25 janvier 2022 11:45 AM</div><div id="to"><b>À:</b> tagging@openstreetmap.org</div><div id="reply_to"><b>Répondre à:</b> tagging@openstreetmap.org</div><div id="subject"><b>Objet:</b> Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - boundary=forest(_compartment) v3</div></div></td></tr></tbody></table> <br> </div><!--start of _originalContent --><div name="BB10" dir="auto" style="background-image: initial; line-height: initial; outline: none;" contenteditable="false"><div><p><br>
</p><div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/1/22 04:10, David Marchal via
Tagging wrote:<br>
</div><blockquote type="cite">
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px">
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px">Hello, there.<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px">I drafted a
new proposal regarding forests. Contrary to the last
iteration, it is not about forestry: the proposed tagging
scheme is only about delimited forests and their compartments,
wether the stand is subject to forestry or not. This
forest/wood (or managed/unmanaged) issue is too complex to be
solved as a side-effect of another proposal, and should be
treated apart; besides, the limits of forests and compartments
may be maintained without forestry works taking place on the
stand.<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px">Here is the
proposal: <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforest%28_compartment%29_relations_%28v3%29" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boundary%3Dforest(_compartment)_relations_(v3)</a><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px"><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px">If interested,
please discuss the proposal on its Talk page.<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:'arial';font-size:14px"><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote><p><br>
</p><p>It appears to me that this separation into smaller parts is also
occurring in other OSM features;</p><p><br>
</p><p>universities - faculties/departments/*</p><p>hospitals - wards/units/*</p><p>In the future it may well occur in offices, factories,
warehouses... Of course I may have missed this already occurring
elsewhere. <br>
</p><p><br>
</p><p>It would be good to have a common method of dividing the present
OSM key, what ever they maybe, into smaller bits. The values of
the smaller bits could be free text.. at least at this stage. <br>
</p><p><br>
</p><p><br>
</p></div>
<!--end of _originalContent --></div></body></html>