<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Jan 24, 2022, 19:39 by frederik@remote.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>I disapprove of your attempt to formalise deprecation reasons because deprecation does not exist as a formal concept in OSM. I think you are trying to introduce deprecation as a formal concept through the back door.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am ok with saying "it is not recommended to use this tag any more" or "this is an old-fashioned tag", but nobody on this list or the wiki has the authority to actually deprecate a tag.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">What is the difference between "it is not recommended to use this tag any more" and<br></div><div dir="auto">"this tag is deprecated"? I consider this as having the same meaning and use the second<br></div><div dir="auto">one as it is easier to type.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">("this is an old-fashioned tag" applies also to widely used tags that should continue to be<br></div><div dir="auto">used so it is quite different)<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Also, which parts of OSM tagging exist as a formal concept?<br></div> </body>
</html>