<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>Osm-carto used to display (pre-cartocss?) each and every relations route name.<br>It is hopefully no longer the case.<br>Yves <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 19 février 2022 11:59:49 GMT+01:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Feb 18, 2022, 13:04 by pelderson@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="">We have talked in the past about the name tag in route names. It often contains non-name elements. This appears to be driven by how people want to see the routes displayed in lists. <br></div></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="">From, To, Via, Ref, Purpose, Region, and Part numbers are popular elements. These elements are layed out to produce alphabetically ordered and 'pretty print' route list in applications and maintenance tools.<br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="">Understandable, but not conform the 'name=just the name' principle, which is important for clean data and for a.o. Nominatim. <br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class=""> <br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="">To clean this up, From, To, Via, Ref can go in the well-known from=*, via=*, to=*, and ref=* tags. Region, Purpose (e.g. "German part of the GR5"), can be moved to description=*.<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">+1, editors can display identifiers of relations based on such tags<br></div><div dir="auto">Fake name tags should not be added, this lowers quality of data and is <br></div><div dir="auto">form of mistagging for renderer.<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" class="">I think OSM Carto uses displays the name tag and object Id for all relations.<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">As far as I remember, only relations displayed by OSM Carto are <br></div><div dir="auto">(1) areas (=multipolygons) and their ids are not displayed at all.<br></div><div dir="auto">(2) boundary relations (basically, also areas) - and their ids are not displayed at all<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Standard_tile_layer">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Standard_tile_layer</a><br></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>