<html><head></head><body>Lastly, when working on the routing functionality on Opensnowmap.org, I've found dealing with non-specific oneway=* for foot, ski, etc. extremely complicated and not possible to interpret at all in some cases.<br>I'm all in favor for explicit piste:oneway=*, oneway:foot=*, oneway:bicycle=* and so on, keeping oneway=* for vehicles only. <br>Yves <br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Le 19 mars 2022 15:03:56 GMT+01:00, Philip Barnes <phil@trigpoint.me.uk> a écrit :<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre dir="auto" class="k9mail">On Sat, 2022-03-19 at 14:52 +0100, Marc_marc wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Le 19.03.22 à 13:37, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> <br></blockquote> <br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">Is it correct to map oneway hiking trail as<br>highway=path + oneway=yes + foot=yes + bicycle=no + ski=no +<br>snowmobile=no<br>?<br></blockquote><br>it will depend on the country (since in some countries path allows<br>e.g. <br>mopeds and/or horses)<br>but yes something like highway=path + oneway=yes seems fine.<br><br><br></blockquote>I would not expect there to be a legal one way for foot.<br><br>A route may only be waymarked in one direction and the guidebook<br>written that way.<br><br>But it would be very odd to be illegal to walk it in the 'wrong'<br>direction.<br><br>Phil (trigpoint) <hr>Tagging mailing list<br>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging</a><br></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>