<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Apr 25, 2022, 11:28 by hervbeof@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto"><div>I'm thinking about amenities like Telephone boxes and Postal boxes. If they have been removed you can either delete them from OSM or tag then with the removed life cycle prefix. The advantage of the second is that it might prevent someone re-adding the feature using old imagery or survey information.<br></div><div dir="auto">Is this the preferred approach or is there some problem with this approach?<br></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">For things likely to be mapped from aerial lifecycle prefix can be used until imagery is<br></div><div dir="auto">updated (but deletion is also OK and fine).<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">For things very unlikely to be mapped from aerial imagery - deletion is preferable.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">> i or survey information.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Why someone would survey and add nonexisting postal box/telephone box?<br></div> </body>
</html>