<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/04/2022 23:59, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXrXVDNXojCa55JnpSTpKH97MD5O5j6iyyXOkac_rGZL+g@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<div>On the subject of gates & access, we had a Note (<a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3148597"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3148597</a>)
that somebody complained that their router told them to use
a different road, apparently because this one had a gate on
it? But the gate didn't include anything about access=no /
private, locked=yes or anything similar, it's just tagged as
a gate on an unclassified road? It's now been tagged as
access=yes to resolve this, but we assume it's a router
error?<br>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes. Some routers avoid all gates (even some cycle routers). It
helps to find out which broken router is the problem in any
particular case.<br>
</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Andy</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>