<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>I think that tagging shop on entire area is not really wrong.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div>But I would prefer node/area covering just shopping area, <br></div><div dir="auto">and keep parking, offices and warehousing area not visited by clients<br></div><div dir="auto">outside it.<br></div><div><br></div><div>May 4, 2022, 12:08 by nathancase@outlook.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hi all,<br></div><div><br></div><div>Similar to an earlier question around tagging amenities (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-September/062406.html), I wonder if there is a consensus on using shop=* for areas larger than just buildings.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Shop=garden_centre and shop=car are examples where the "shop" is often much larger than just one individual building. In both cases, these shops tend to have large outdoor areas where plants/cars are displayed for sale. They form an integral part of the shop - but are not part of a main building.<br></div><div><br></div><div>In such cases, are we OK tagging the whole area (including outdoor sections) inside one large shop=* area? If so, do we include other bits such as car parks, grassy areas etc?<br></div><div><br></div><div>The wiki isn't clear on this, and tagging seems a little mixed (some apply shop=* to the whole area, though most seem to only apply shop=* to the main building and tag the rest as landuse=retail).<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>Tagging mailing list<br></div><div>Tagging@openstreetmap.org<br></div><div>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>