<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><br><br><div dir="ltr">sent from a phone</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 5 May 2022, at 10:24, Nathan Case <nathancase@outlook.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">Thanks all for the input so far. It looks like it's fine to map
larger shops as a "campus" - but perhaps only customer accessible
areas/buildings (if possible to define - so excluding, for
example, office buildings).</div></blockquote><br><div><br></div><div>currently it is the common practice, if shops are mapped as polygons, that the auxiliary areas like staff bathrooms, storage, room for having a break, office, access areas, are all included in the polygon (because a whole building is typically getting the tag). 90% of shop tags on ways (about 20-25% of all shops) are combined with building=* <a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop?filter=ways#combinations">https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop?filter=ways#combinations</a></div><div><br></div><div>So while we could agree that shop=* should not include these private access parts, it would be a paradigm change and not what is currently done.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers Martin </div></body></html>