<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Substation_nodes_extension">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Substation_nodes_extension</a><br></div><div dir="auto">opens with claim, presented as obviously true:<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">"power=substation are facilities and substation=minor_distribution and <br></div><div dir="auto">substation=distribution are the only ones that could be mapped on a node."<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">why other substations cannot be mapped as nodes?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">All objects mappable as areas can be mapped as nodes if no<br></div><div dir="auto">better quality can be achieved<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Mapping for example cemeteries as nodes is inferior to areas, but better <br></div><div dir="auto">than nothing.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">For example for building benefits are extremely small over missing data<br></div><div dir="auto">- but still it is preferable to adding them with fake geometries and<br></div><div dir="auto">improvements over no data at all (though mapping other features may be<br></div><div dir="auto">better use of time)<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Why mapping major substations as nodes is supposed to be not OK?<br></div> </body>
</html>